![]() |
Re: Song length quota?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I don't think the current request scheme is going to be modified anytime soon. I've coded changes that, IMO, have put a real damper on the over-requesting. Long tracks are, however, the nature of prog and I'm not going to give a 5 minute track any preference over a 25 minute track. I say I'm not as it will likely fall upon me to code it. |
Re: Song length quota?
It's just an idea if there are a few who "monopolize" the time by requesting 5 epics a day while others request 5 short pieces. Proportionality is the idea.
|
Re: Song length quota?
VaxMan, help clear something up for me:
"With just a handful of requesters, this is already realized without any programming effort at all." Does this statement imply that if enough (a handful) requesters (to make the change) ask, you will make the change that includes a 1 hour, 2 hour, 3 hour delay between requests? Or does it mean that there are only a handful of requesters (being song requesters), so the issue is "not an issue" and doesn't need to be addressed? I hope it is the latter. I would be disappointed if Joe Shmoe could request a 9 minute track every hour, and Sue Shmue had to wait two hours after requesting an 11 minute song. I'm a fan of the CURRENT system. :boxing: |
Re: Song length quota?
Quote:
Another kind of person, "those who say they can't do math" when they really can. "Oh I was never good at math"....I hear that all the time... |
Re: Song length quota?
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Song length quota?
Quote:
|
Re: Song length quota?
Quote:
I'd bet, if you would calculate the average song lenght requested versus the average song lenght in the library, that the average song length requested is a lot higher. I've noticed that on non-request Wednesday there are only few of them long songs played compared to other days. Having said that. I've noticed by now that generally, there is no big problem. I would have left already if there was. |
Re: Song length quota?
Let me throw in a couple of questions.......OK?
Is the music heard on Aural Moon generally of a high standard? If we're going to disappear up our own jacksies and talk statistics (lies, damned lies and statistics.....you get my drift?)......what proportion of tracks played are not good, regardless of length? And my final question is: If you're peeved about waiting for a song that you have requested to play, why not go through it in your head and then play it in the car going home or stick it on the deck as soon as you get home. C'mon......life's too short to worry about trivialities and the Moon is a free service after all. Just be happy with what we have to be happy with..........or something like that!!!! |
Re: Song length quota?
Yes Keithie is right - this thread is turning into a kindergarten where request bureaucracy will take over than the important thing which is prog music - If you want to hear the music more often - buy it.
|
Re: Song length quota?
stick a fork in it... this one is done.
|
Re: Song length quota?
I've made this same mistake before about assumption, but I see nothing in this thread that anyone is complaining.
It just seems like a discussion that sometimes got a bit silly. |
Re: Song length quota?
> but I see nothing in this thread that anyone is complaining.
agreed. |
Re: Song length quota?
Quote:
I was having fun with this thread and I don't feel any post in it was a complaint. |
Re: Song length quota?
I'm not complaining, but I think you should have to count to ten days to listen to King's X...:hmph: :deadhorse : :aua: :surrender
|
Re: Song length quota?
Quote:
C'mon.....decades at least!!!!! :neener: |
Re: Song length quota?
Be careful any band with an X in their name may subject to the same delay.:rockband: =8^O
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:24 AM. |
Integrated by BBpixel Team 2025 :: jvbPlugin R1011.362.1
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.