Aural Moon - Progressive Rock Discussion

Aural Moon - Progressive Rock Discussion (http://auralmoon.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Discussion/Prog News (http://auralmoon.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   Errors / Typos in the playlist (http://auralmoon.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1017)

Roger -Dot- Lee 08-04-2004 07:58 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Yesspaz
Good heavens! You don't actually THINK I'm gonna dj them?!?!?! I wouldn't want to hear the same song back to back no matter WHAT it was! I just put the bait out there and ya took it again! :p

Well, spaz, stranger things have happened. I've seen all six Tubular Bells RQed back to back, in order (obviously someone at work knowing how these things operate). And a couple of days ago, we had two GY!BE RQs in the same hour. These, however, came from different sources, so I can't blame a single person for it, and since I don't have access to phone records, I have no way of proving collusion.

Quote:


Seriously, I'm just trying to save hard drive space and kill the duplicate, that's all.

An admirable goal under any circumstances.

Roger -Dot- Lee

Yesspaz 08-04-2004 09:47 AM

Yeah, that second GYBE! request was mine. I was like, "Yea! my GYBE! request is next!" and then it turned out to be "Storm" instead of "Sleep." Immediately I chuckled wondering how many people would just groan.

KeithieW 08-04-2004 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Yesspaz
Immediately I chuckled wondering how many people would just groan.
Or reach for the mute button.

zvinki 08-04-2004 10:22 AM

Or turn up the volume, sit back and enjoy. :)

Rick and Roll 08-04-2004 11:29 AM

must be...
 
the heavy water running down the st lawrence river....;)

Roger -Dot- Lee 08-05-2004 11:33 AM

Re: must be...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Rick and Roll
the heavy water running down the st lawrence river....;)
Their water's heavier than ours? That might explain why their beer is so much better than ours.

Of course, this does NOT explain the Mononghahela (I think that's how it's spelled. I'm not sure). That water's heavier than ours too (when it's not on fire, that is), but their beer is hideous.

zvinki 08-05-2004 11:46 AM

I agree with dot-man, the beer is more likely the cause than the water. Either that or it's a rare showing of Canadian patriotism.

moses 08-11-2004 02:33 PM

sorry, there's another one
 
There is a Gilgamesh track playing right now... it's the "Island of Rohdes/Paper Boat/.." one. No big deal, but "Rhodes" is spelled wrong.

This is one where the ID3v2 could also be implemented to finish off the rest of the song title. I think there are a couple from that cd with some rather long titles that would benefit from ID3v2.

Yesspaz 08-11-2004 02:37 PM

I'm with ya Moses, but don't get Dotter started on redoing the tags!!!:eek:

Roger -Dot- Lee 08-12-2004 12:05 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Yesspaz
I'm with ya Moses, but don't get Dotter started on redoing the tags!!!:eek:
Tell ya what, 'spaz: I'll let YOU dig the post up.

Seriously, I'm not aware that the station even supports v3.2 tags, and given the station instability of late, I'm not sure I'd like to experiment.

I'll investigate, however.

Roger -Dot- Lee "It's in the archives."

moses 08-12-2004 07:56 AM

Roger.Lee said:
Quote:

I'm not aware that the station even supports v3.2 tags
I don't know if that's a typo or a confusion. I'm not aware that there is such a thing as v3.2. There might be, but I'm not aware of it.

I was referring to ID3 version 2. The station apparently DOES support those, because they are on all the newer songs on the station. By 'newer' I mean since at least 5/19/2004 when Don Caballero's monstrously long song titles got added using ID3 version 2 tags and didn't get truncated.

As far as SAM2 is concerned, any ID3 tags you want to throw at it are fine, unless perhaps you're on a really old version or something.

Anyhow, should this thread perhaps be locked up or something, since we're worried that editing tags will bring the station down? I'm sure we'd rather live with a minor misspelling than bring the station down. (Though I must admit that I think you're getting overly worried about nothing.)

Roger -Dot- Lee 08-12-2004 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by moses
Roger.Lee said:


I don't know if that's a typo or a confusion. I'm not aware that there is such a thing as v3.2. There might be, but I'm not aware of it.



Typo, confusion, and the fact that it was 1am. Guilty as charged. I meant ID3V2.


Quote:


Anyhow, should this thread perhaps be locked up or something, since we're worried that editing tags will bring the station down? I'm sure we'd rather live with a minor misspelling than bring the station down. (Though I must admit that I think you're getting overly worried about nothing.)

I probably am. I wasn't aware that ID3V2 tags had been installed (though it makes sense that it does).

And I always get overly worried about petty things. It's part of my job.

Roger -Dot- Lee, who's damn good at it, too.

progdirjim 08-12-2004 11:29 AM

here's the deal.

at one point, the software we use to manage mp3 tags didn't support ID3V2. we have newer software that does. that's why all the newer ones have the longer fields.

I have been re-ripping the entire library at 192K bit rate (vs 128K), and those re-rips will have the new tags. There will probably still be plenty that retain the old tags, based on when the new software came into play (I forget when that was.) As we see them, and as we have time, we will fix them. No promises as to when, as that is a lower priority than other station tasks, and we all have day jobs and families.

Redoing the tags won't bring the station down, but adding the truncated information is a MANUAL process, as well as BORING, so it will continue to be a lower priority.

Hope that explains it...

roger 08-12-2004 11:40 AM

do you ever sleep?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by progdirjim
I have been re-ripping the entire library
yowza...

VAXman 08-12-2004 01:22 PM

Pink Floyd: Remember a Day problem
 
Pink Floyd "Remember A Day" off of Saucerful of Secrets played today
at anout 12:20edt. It was described as "Set the Controls for the Heart
of the Sun" in What's Playing Now? as well as in the stream as shown
by my iTunes software display.

Roger -Dot- Lee 08-12-2004 04:21 PM

Re: Pink Floyd: Remember a Day problem
 
Quote:

Originally posted by VAXman
Pink Floyd "Remember A Day" off of Saucerful of Secrets played today
at anout 12:20edt. It was described as "Set the Controls for the Heart
of the Sun" in What's Playing Now? as well as in the stream as shown
by my iTunes software display.

Now that's bizarre. According to the history, it was in fact "Set the Controls" that played, and not "Remember a day". They are both tracks off of Saucerful of Secrets. The times recorded match. I'll download both tracks and see if I can figure out what's going on (I suspect that we might have a track swap), although I'm nowhere near familiar enough with the album to say which is which.

I shall, however, investigate.

Roger -Dot- Lee, on the job. :D

progdirjim 08-12-2004 05:12 PM

Re: Re: Pink Floyd: Remember a Day problem
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Roger Lee
Now that's bizarre. According to the history, it was in fact "Set the Controls" that played, and not "Remember a day". They are both tracks off of Saucerful of Secrets. The times recorded match. I'll download both tracks and see if I can figure out what's going on (I suspect that we might have a track swap), although I'm nowhere near familiar enough with the album to say which is which.

I shall, however, investigate.

Roger -Dot- Lee, on the job. :D

here's the deal:

Somehow, all the track names are one track away from the correct place; so track 1 has track 2's name; track 2 has track 3's name; etc. Not sure how that happened, but you can bet it was operator (me) error.

I've corrected this and re-uploaded Roger dot - replace when ready...

Roger -Dot- Lee 08-13-2004 12:25 AM

Re: Re: Re: Pink Floyd: Remember a Day problem
 
Quote:

Originally posted by progdirjim
here's the deal:

Somehow, all the track names are one track away from the correct place; so track 1 has track 2's name; track 2 has track 3's name; etc. Not sure how that happened, but you can bet it was operator (me) error.

I've corrected this and re-uploaded Roger dot - replace when ready...

Ready, replaced, and ready for requests.

Roger -Dot- Lee, as alliterative as one can expect from a geek.

Bob Lentil 08-13-2004 09:48 AM

After the recent Pain of Salvation update, we now have two copies of Ashes. One from the full album and one from the single, I think. I'm pretty sure the tracks are extremely close to, if not, identical, and we could do without one of them.

Roger -Dot- Lee 08-13-2004 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Bob Lentil
After the recent Pain of Salvation update, we now have two copies of Ashes. One from the full album and one from the single, I think. I'm pretty sure the tracks are extremely close to, if not, identical, and we could do without one of them.
One of them (the older one) has been temporarily removed from the RQ bin. Once I hear from Jim one way or the other, I'll either restore it or remove it entirely. They appear to be off the same album.

Roger -Dot- Lee


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:00 AM.

Integrated by BBpixel Team 2025 :: jvbPlugin R1011.362.1
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.