Aural Moon - Progressive Rock Discussion

Aural Moon - Progressive Rock Discussion (http://auralmoon.com/forum/index.php)
-   Music Suggestions (http://auralmoon.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Charles Ives (http://auralmoon.com/forum/showthread.php?t=873)

artboy 12-24-2003 10:42 PM

Charles Ives
 
1 Attachment(s)
I have heard a few classical composers on AM that relate to the prog genre,...ie.... Mozart and Beethoven; However, I would like to suggest that a rather unknown composer by the name of Charles Ives might enlighten the inquisitive mind far more than the "mainstream" composers named above...... Ives' Piano Sonata No. 2 (particularly the "The Alcotts" movement) is an excellent compostion..... dissonate and emotional...the trademark of most prog.. Even if AM does not add this to their playlist, anyone interested in THE most significant "unheralded" American Composer of the 20th century should check this piece out...You WON't be dissappointed.

ARTBOY

KeithieW 12-25-2003 04:33 PM

Yes to that artboy.
 
I'd also recommend Ives' "Unanswered Question" and his 4th Symphony.

There is a remarkable passage in the 4th that sounds like 2 marching bands playing different tunes approach and pass and then march away from each other. A truly masteful piece of orchestration.

podakayne 12-26-2003 02:16 PM

having very simular taste as the afore posted members, i would be very interested in having Ives added to the rouster. indeed having a few more classical 20th century composers could flesh out the many sides of this genre. i also like the film scores of bernard herrmann.

Yesspaz 12-28-2003 04:24 PM

AHHHH!
 
NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO!!!!!!!!:mad:

artboy 12-28-2003 05:14 PM

Wise?...NO NO NO NO!!!!!!!!!!!
 
"Nothing is easier than fault-finding; no talent, no self denial, no character are required to set up in the grumbling business." - Robert West.

KeithieW 12-28-2003 06:05 PM

Hmmmmmm!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Yesspaz
NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO!!!!!!!!:mad:
Interesting argument against there Y.

podakayne 12-28-2003 07:29 PM

Yesspaz plez
 
i know you can be much more articulate than that...expound! and perhaps i can see your point of view even if i don't agree with it.

roger 12-29-2003 07:52 AM

I think the whole classical thing has been gone over (too?) many times on these pages... as much as many of us like and listen to it, it really doesn't have a place on AM. maybe start a pinned topic where people can list their favorites and recommendations, but let's be done with suggestions for adding it.
it's good discussion material, however! :D

Yesspaz 12-29-2003 10:43 AM

Arg!
 
My reasoning against Classical music on AM is solid. If people would check out old posts before going ballistic, things would be a lot simpler.

There are at least two, if not three old threads where we debated classical on AM endlessly. I made my case against it there. I see no need to restate an entire thread here. So the emphatic NO's sufficed. If you want to read articulate arguments against classical, dig up those threads. Thank you.




Artboy, be nice. Darth Maul is watching you.

Rick and Roll 12-29-2003 05:28 PM

Digging in the dirt....
 
I tried to look back on old threads over the weekend. It gave me headache!

There are some real gems though. It's just very difficult for us humans....

artboy 12-30-2003 08:05 AM

classical on AM
 
I am relatively new to AM...thus I have not been involved nor knew there was a previous debate about classical music here...sorry Yesspaz... I was simply making the arguement that if there is Mozart and Beethoven here, why not Charles Ives whom I consider to have some compostions that have similar structures, dissonances, and chord progressions as our beloved proggers..... Also, pertaining to yesspaz's advice to be nice?...I NEVER put down anyone's music suggestion NEVER...instead I prefer using my energies to support those I want to hear. I feel that the lack of reponses to a suggestion thread speaks far louder than negative words.

roger 12-30-2003 08:23 AM

artboy, don't stress it. Yesspaz gets a bit intense. :D I think discussion is always good. some sub-forums for discussion of other genres of music might make it easier... it can be difficult to find older topics of relevance.
btw, I really enjoy your art! it resonates very well. and a terrific web site, also. :cool:

Rick and Roll 12-30-2003 08:28 AM

"silver and gold"
 
Really though, he thought you meant Burl Ives............

roger 12-30-2003 08:34 AM

Re: "silver and gold"
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Rick and Roll
Burl Ives............
:D :D :D

artboy 12-30-2003 09:08 AM

NOT BURL IVES
 
Charles Ives is NOT BURL IVES!!!!!!....all proggers should take the time to listen to this American composer!

Rick and Roll 12-30-2003 09:23 AM

Artboy!
 
Being sort of out of the loop as far as classical (I have Joe Jackson's record, but that doesn't count), I would like to hear this
Charles Ives too.

You know I'm kidding about Burl Ives.

artboy 12-30-2003 10:05 AM

Burl Ives...NO NO NO NO NO!!!!!!!
 
I knew you were joking RnR....but many DO get the 2 confused as not many know about Charles......He was an incredible American composer of the early 1900's that refused to play the role of a stereotypic composer and did most of his work in anonymity....some of his work is a bit too marching band-like for my tastes...but there are a few pieces that are incredibly complex and worth checking out!...check out his piano Sonata #2...especially the "Thoreau" movement...you might be surprised!

Yesspaz 12-30-2003 05:30 PM

Hmmm
 
Yesspaz gets a little intense, huh? Thanks for the complement!:)


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:48 PM.

Integrated by BBpixel Team 2025 :: jvbPlugin R1011.362.1
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.