Quote:
Originally posted by kirk
i can't believe i overlooked this thread 'til now..(!)
|
S'OK, Sir. I'd have eventually come to you once we started making noises.
I'm not kidding in the least when I say that my knowledge of such things is on par with my knowledge of brain surgery (I'm aware that they both exist, and that's about it).
Quote:
dot~ you've dl'd tunes from my rifftrader account.
do you think it's user friendly enough for this?
|
I'd have to register an emphatic 'YES' on this. However, I've seen the downloads, not the uploads. Is it much different? If not, it should be a walk in the park.
Quote:
also, most dsl/broadband allows for up to 5 mg.
direct transfer to IE. while working out parts, it saves
beau coup time to send 128k files rather than the full .wav,
especially for dialup users.
|
For the initial work, perhaps. But we have to remember that we're going to be working with the lowest common denominator here. If we can do my gig, and, say, Spaz and Moses at 192k, but Elric (or Roger or Sharc or ...) can only come in at 128k, will we not all be forced down? What kind of hit are we going to have to take? Will it matter and will we be able to work with/around it?
See? My knowledge of such things is, shall we say, rather limited.
Quote:
fire the questions, i'm at the computer all day.
|
Heh. You DID ask. See? He asked for it!
Roger -Dot- Lee