Re: Re: To all trying so hard......
Quote:
Originally posted by Yesspaz
Nah. The point of internet radio is to EXPOSE the lesser knowns so that they become "not-lesser" knowns.
But sharc brings up a good point on the payola idea, and that is knowing when the rq plays. Nothing would stink worse than paying for a request and then a replay of Gags or Gnosis comes on and by the time it plays you're sitting at a red light in Malfunction Junction on the way home. Scratch the payola.
What about another pay feed, say 96k for $25? Or, since there are so few $50 members, would lowering that bring in more money by volume? Do I have a freaking clue what I'm talking about? Does this have anything to do with the "busy-signal?" Is there tea in China?
|
I'll take a whack at this.
In no particular order:
- I'm not sure our software supports 96k. I'd have to investigate.
- We pay by use, not on how many slots we have, so lowering the number of available slots would have no effect. That's what I was lead to believe, and if this isn't the case, Jim will likely correct me. But that's what I unnerstand.
- Yeah, it's a good idea, just not under the model (a 1953 Edsel) that we're operating under
- Yes.
- Only when operating under the license granted by Charles Nelson Riley, Phyllis Diller, and in the center square, Paul Lynne!
Roger -Dot- Lee, It's really a Studabaker, but I'm not sure of the spelling.
__________________
Roger -Dot- Lee
El Queso Media Grande
Unrepentant Geek
Officially sanctioned station dude emeritus
Generally agreed upon second in command of OS, Web, and hardware. On the Moon.
"[m]y iPod is solar powered" Aural Moon!
|