|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Chat Revisited
Okay - it looks like for the new website, we'll have to get a new chat system. I'm going to post several different chat demos in this thread - I'd appreciate it if folks could try and use these chats, and see what happens, and which ones you prefer. Keep in mind that these chat systems will automatically logged in with your user name when it's integrated into the Aural Moon site in the end.
When you describe if the chat works, or doesn't, please list your: computer type & speed internet connection type web browser Thanks for the help! Also, if you find a chat system out there that you'd think we'd like to use, post it here! Avian |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I'm probably being dumb but.....
Tried Flashchat and was told that user called Guest was already logged in...........
![]() PC Pentium( R ) 4 CPU 3.00Ghz (Using MS Windows XP Professional Service Pack 2) 2.99 Ghx 1Gb Ram 1 mg Broadband AOL ************************************************** Tried again after poda left. Seems very similar to one we used to have on the home Page a while back. that didn't get to many fans among the morning crew I seem to remember. I thought it was OK though.........but then I'm English and use a PC ![]() Last edited by KeithieW : 10-03-2005 at 05:27 PM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
flash chat
macintosh G4, OS 10.3.9, firefox 1.0.4 browser. DSL line i believe.
seems to work fine, however i was there by myself. ![]() |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Windows XP Professional.........Pentium 4..........3.2........2 gig RAM.....Right now.......extremely varied broadband. Works well, no problem logging in but as with Poda........all by myself.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Forgot my browser........
![]() |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
I clicked on the link, and was there with aaa and punkais....i knew neither. i asked "where am I" and one said "in a chat room". Then they left. Quite strange.
I have windows xp. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Chat Revisited
Quote:
Cable modem, IE, Dell Dimension 8200. I have no idea about my speed or even how to find out ![]()
__________________
Feels like I'm fiddling while Rome is burning down. Think I'll lay my fiddle down, take a rifle from the ground! |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Re: first one to try out
Quote:
![]() My only concern is that it is Flash... very CPU intensive.
__________________
VAXman -- Watcher of the moon, watcher of all. ----------------Mopper of the moon, mopper of all. -------------------- Aural Moon's Janitorial Services ---------------------and Restroom Supplies, and Techno-patsy -- ![]() |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Re: first one to try out
Quote:
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Re: Re: first one to try out
Quote:
Good lord! 333 MHz P2? Well, I think around 1 GHz P5/AMD is probably the "base" system that I'll go with - that's just too old to try and gear it towards. What browser are you using, pray tell? I can't believe Flash even runs on your machine. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Re: Re: Re: first one to try out
Quote:
Last edited by Bob Lentil : 10-04-2005 at 10:48 AM. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
FLASH
Flash - Bang
Got in OK but did something so the whole page zoomed in and I had get difficulty in seeing the panel on the right. Has advantages over SP chat but lacks the nickname possibility Feels like the old chat on the website and I wonder if it's stable Don't bother if its CPU hungry - not worth it The day Vax has no reservations about anything I'll have a heart attack and drop dead. I have a XP 3 Ghz machine with 1 Giga RAM running XP and Explorer
__________________
Beware of the Spanish Inquisition,coming to a town NEAR you |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
VAXman -- Watcher of the moon, watcher of all. ----------------Mopper of the moon, mopper of all. -------------------- Aural Moon's Janitorial Services ---------------------and Restroom Supplies, and Techno-patsy -- ![]() |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Re: FLASH
Quote:
However, I would rather have my CPU chugging cycles on something useful instead of the braindamaged idle loops in the Flash engine clock and event scheduler.
__________________
VAXman -- Watcher of the moon, watcher of all. ----------------Mopper of the moon, mopper of all. -------------------- Aural Moon's Janitorial Services ---------------------and Restroom Supplies, and Techno-patsy -- ![]() |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
I prefer X7 to Flash.
I like very much simplicity and climate of current SPC and IMHO some very modern looking chats may have technology but miss that old atmo of AM White Room. Presence of this is for me the criterion number 1. Sempron 2800+, 512 RAM, 640 kb broadband, Avant Browser.
__________________
---------------------------------------- Back on duty, hog eat hog Faffless in the deeeevil's playground ![]() |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
flash is nice...
but the x7 simpler.
my 2¢ ![]() |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
I prefer the black box, I like to see who's around etc. The white is ok...I'm sure you'll pick the right one.
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
One thing I'm looking into is combining the white and black room, if it's possible. Have this sitting in one pane on the main page that would be the main chatroom. I know people have done this with FlashChat, but I don't think it's a good idea to having to download the flash app and have CPU cycles running right on the main page. I dunno. Maybe it's possible with the X7, too.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:10 PM. |