|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Rate the vocalist scale
Last monday night we were discussing the merits or lack thereof that some of the vocalists in the featured bands.
I hit upon a new scale that I'm sure we all can use with equal gusto. I Call it: the Hammill-O-Meter Pronounced Hammillometer or simply HOM for those prone to TLA. The original scale was to be 0.0 - 5.0. However Jim mentioned Hammill himself as a benchmark is infinity, which absurd for a scientific unit of measure. Infinity is of course undefined. Indeed, it's kinda like being a moron. there are all kinds of morons. So the resolution of the scale 0.0 to 10.0. 0.0 == good ( maybe even Great) vocalist. 1.0 == good to fine. 2.0 == indifferent etc. etc. down to 10.0 == almost Hammillistic perfection (ie: fingernails on a chalkboard) We now have a rating scale, derived through rigorous scientific study ( a few beers ), for ease of use. EXAMPLE: Jon Anderson would be an HOM rating of 0.0. Captain Beefheart HOM 9.0 Me (TheFish) HOM 9.9. (you have never heard me sing ) You may now obtain your Phd in HOM. Don't get excited this is a joke. I am sorry if the topic offends anyone with opposite views.
__________________
"A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on." - Winston Churchill " A dog will look up to you, A cat will look down on you, but a pig will look you straight in the eye" - W. Churchill "There are three things Money can't buy, Manners, Morals and Integrity." - Me Last edited by TheFish : 01-04-2012 at 08:04 PM. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:07 PM. |