Go Back   Aural Moon - Progressive Rock Discussion > Prog Rock Discussion > General Discussion/Prog News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 11-03-2006, 09:40 AM
VAXman's Avatar
VAXman(Admin) VAXman is offline
progger propellerhead
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Presently reside in Jackson (southern) NJ (20 miles east of NEARfest 2002 & 2003
Posts: 2,362
Send a message via AIM to VAXman Send a message via Skype™ to VAXman
Re: Sciences on Moon

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick and Roll View Post
Alchemy relates to a spiritual element. Medicine relates to the science of many things..disease treatment, causes, healing.

This is not religion vs science. Medicine is no religion. It is science.

Your opinion of the effectiveness of Medicine is no reflection on it's rightful inclusion as Science.

The main reason we know so little is that we keep introducing new issues to the the species. While it is very difficult to keep up, it is undeniable that incredible strides have been made.

If I had my heart surgery or my skin cancer treated 15 years ago, I'd be awful shape because of the improvements in the SCIENCE.
...and a lifetime with renal failure/nephritis, diabetes, gout, hypertension, and mouthfulls of tablets and injections of potions hasn't cured anything... only treated the symptoms. My son had open heart surgery. It fixed the symptoms of the problem but not its causes. My wife suffers from seisures. They're poison her with potions pretending to have a f*ing clue what they are doing but they don't know. They take tracings of electrical fields produced from the brain. BFD... they can't read her thoughts from them nor deduce what these signals ACTUALLY represent.

Watson and Crick decoded the chemisty of DNA but do we really know what the pairings of guanine, adenine, thymine and cytosine mean? No. They're busy splicing genes together in the laboratory now hoping to discover what will be produced like a kid randomly mixing the chemicals from a chemisty set without a clue as to the chemical process. When there's a theory that can predict the outcome, then it will be science. The day the can tell us that the sequence of say, cytosine+adenine+thymine will produce a cat ( ), then we have science.

What irks me about medicine is that the don't know anything and for that privilege, they command big money. It's a freakin' gamble just as with the other "practiced" profession. The problem with this gambling is that it is just like Las Vegas... an empire built on the backs of losers -- or in this case, the unfortunates with medical issues.

Suffice to say, medicine is medicine... but not science.
__________________
VAXman -- Watcher of the moon, watcher of all.
----------------Mopper of the moon, mopper of all.
-------------------- Aural Moon's Janitorial Services
---------------------and Restroom Supplies, and Techno-patsy --

Cogito ergo iMac.         
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-03-2006, 10:01 AM
KeithieW
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Sciences on Moon

Medicine and Science............

This is definitely one of those tweeners.

I agree that medicine treats symptoms NOT causes but the research that goes on to develop those treatments must surely be classed as science.

A dictionary definition I found for "SCIENCE" states:

science

noun

1 (Knowledge obtained from) the systematic study of the structure and behaviour of the physical world, especially by observing, measuring and experimenting, and the development of theories to describe the results of these activities

I think that this covers medical research as well.....so you can take it either way.

I understand what Martha is going through because I suffer from Temporal Lobe Epilepsy and I'm being treated by popping lots of pills that were developed in a laboratory and while the prescribing of said pills isn't scientific the development of them surely is.

Just my 2p worth.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-03-2006, 10:56 AM
Rick and Roll's Avatar
Rick and Roll Rick and Roll is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Baltimore suburbs
Posts: 5,039
Re: Sciences on Moon

Quote:
Originally Posted by KeithieW View Post
Medicine and Science............

This is definitely one of those tweeners.

I agree that medicine treats symptoms NOT causes but the research that goes on to develop those treatments must surely be classed as science.

A dictionary definition I found for "SCIENCE" states:

science

noun

1 (Knowledge obtained from) the systematic study of the structure and behaviour of the physical world, especially by observing, measuring and experimenting, and the development of theories to describe the results of these activities

I think that this covers medical research as well.....so you can take it either way.

I understand what Martha is going through because I suffer from Temporal Lobe Epilepsy and I'm being treated by popping lots of pills that were developed in a laboratory and while the prescribing of said pills isn't scientific the development of them surely is.

Just my 2p worth.
It's not a tweener. It's a science. Again, the effectiveness or cost paid is not a determinant. That's all I'm saying.

Medicine cannot fix a cause of something. Opinions cannot change the fact it's a science. The definition of Medicine states it's a science.

Rant on as you will gentlemen, I'm out. thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-03-2006, 11:03 AM
KeithieW
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Sciences on Moon

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick and Roll View Post
I'm out. thanks.
What's the betting you'll be back.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-03-2006, 02:10 PM
jtmckinley's Avatar
jtmckinley jtmckinley is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Farmington Hills, Michigan (near Detroit)
Posts: 365
Re: Sciences on Moon

Medicine is definitely a science. It's certainly not fully mature in the sense that it can cure all ills, but medical research is very much science. M.D.s on the other hand are sometimes quacks. Most M.D.s are responsible and are trying their best to heal their patients given the tools they have to work with. Some doctors are more skilled/smarter/harder working than others and so one doctor's best will be better than another doctor's best. Also doctors are just humans so they have good days and bad days like the rest of us.

I guess for medicine to be a fully mature science it would need to be able to cure all disease as well as cure death. This may happen some day. For example it may be possible to some day design little nanobots that will float around in our bodies and fix things at the molecular level ensuring our health and immortality (barring catastrophic accidents like a fatal car crash or falling off a cliff). Obviously we're not there yet.

However, I don't really think it's fair to criticize the medical profession because they haven't gotten everything figured out yet. Most of the folks in the medical profession are working very hard to try and develop new treatments and heal their patients. Sometimes the side effects of the cure are worse than the disease and sometimes M.D.s have no choice but to try experimental treatments simply because there is no known treatment for a particular ailment. In that case it's up to the patient to decide if they want to be treated or not. To my knowledge nobody today is forced to undergo medical treatment of any kind (except maybe children since their parents have legal rights over them). One always has the option of refusing treatment and living with the symptoms of the disease, or if the disease is fatal, dying (assuming some self-righteous jackass of a politician doesn't pass some law preventing one's choice).

On the other hand, I certainly think it's worthwhile for people to get a 2nd or even 3rd and 4th opinion before they agree to a particular treatment. As I said above, some doctors are better than others and do a better job of keeping up to date on the latest treatments and sadly a few others are just quacks. Unfortunately it's sometimes difficult for us laymen to know which doctor is better, but I think the more information you have the better. As for the cost of medical treatment, that's a completely separate issue from medicine as science IMHO and gets into the question of whether there should be nationalized (or even globalized) health care and whether that would result in better care overall.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-04-2006, 10:00 AM
Lady Roxelle's Avatar
Lady Roxelle Lady Roxelle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil
Posts: 58
Send a message via ICQ to Lady Roxelle Send a message via Skype™ to Lady Roxelle
Lightbulb A long thought!

Before all, I want to thank you Avian, for placing this stunning wallpaper! I think itīs so inspirating, donīt you?

Yeah, moonies, the discussion grew and grew, and look what we have now!
Why Medicine has brought to table for discussion? I think its very opportune, and maybe inconsciently you mooners, has taken the subject of the 21th century, the "Book of Life"...our bodies, and thatīs why this science is so noble.

SO great thoughts, jtmckinley, about Medicine. I agree you, Medicine is a science - and what a science! Medicine is a science as another one, and englobes others sciences on its way to understand this reality. So, as we experienced here, thereīs a lot of misunderstooding about what Medicine really IS - and what is supposing to be.
In truth, is necessary to be said, medics is not so reliable as they should be - accourding Vernon Coleman, medics should use a warning about its hazardous effects to health. At least, this is what the majority of the people think about them. But is also true, everybody need them. I think that at this point, we can rally see the difference between the medicine of today and the ancient medicine. See the traditional chinese medicine, they use the same resources than 3,000 years ago. On the other hand, the ocidental medicine has evolved a lot. As pharmacology- biochemistry student, I have another sight of this picture. I think that today, the medicine has evolved so much in question as surgeries, so it still depends of the pharmacology to "cure" the diseases, and bring health back. We know, this is not what happens. Iīm sorry to say, Iīm nothing compared americans or europeans pharmacologists, what really matters is money. Of course, you have your "cure", and thereīs a price for this. Often we donīt see this price to pay, the collateral effects is for sure one of this prices. IMHO, I think that this question may be rethinked.
I believe if the person have a headache of some pain thatīs not so persistently, the person should rest and let the natural cure process of the human body acts. Mooners, cīmon, since the pre-historical days this occurs. In the advent of civilization, the alchemy brought the way to use the drugs - all from herbs. In the great navigations, lemon and garlic were the drugstores on board. But, one day somebody has synthesized the Prunus salicina from rosacea, and the history of Medicine and drugs has changed. In my oppinion, I think that is NOT the medicine that youīre administering, but the WAY to do it. Thereīs a difference.
To conclude my thoughts, in this very 21th century weīre whitneses of the Biology advances. Yeah Vax, we donīt know yet what "ACGT" is for. The scientists are on their way, but it might take a lot of decades. To reach the point as shown on "Gattaca" movie, believe me, weīre so far as weīre so closer...I think, it depends on the way for looking on this matter, maybe on the time when the real searching will be the unconditional health improvement, not only money.
I have a vision - Iīm aquarian and Iīm visionary for nature. In this vision, the medicines could be distributted for free in each country, and the citizens might pay the taxes as they pays for the social sevice. And once needing fo some drug, the person receive it as needed. Thereīs some kind of this service here in SUS, the brazilian public health system, so it may be spread for all medicines, without exception.
*************ANARCHY IN PHARMACOLOGY!!! *************
__________________
Silent cries divide the nights...
In the deep and lonely space...
Can anybody hear it?
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 11-04-2006, 12:04 PM
KeithieW
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Sciences on Moon

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick and Roll View Post
well said jt (as I said in my priv msg to you)...and Kleber, also well done.
I win my bet..........
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 11-04-2006, 12:08 PM
VAXman's Avatar
VAXman(Admin) VAXman is offline
progger propellerhead
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Presently reside in Jackson (southern) NJ (20 miles east of NEARfest 2002 & 2003
Posts: 2,362
Send a message via AIM to VAXman Send a message via Skype™ to VAXman
Re: Sciences on Moon

Quote:
Originally Posted by KeithieW View Post
I win my bet..........
__________________
VAXman -- Watcher of the moon, watcher of all.
----------------Mopper of the moon, mopper of all.
-------------------- Aural Moon's Janitorial Services
---------------------and Restroom Supplies, and Techno-patsy --

Cogito ergo iMac.         
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 11-04-2006, 12:49 PM
RogorMortis's Avatar
RogorMortis RogorMortis is offline
Patron
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Denmark
Posts: 699
Re: Sciences on Moon

Quote:
I guess for medicine to be a fully mature science it would need to be able to cure all disease as well as cure death. This may happen some day. For example it may be possible to some day design little nanobots that will float around in our bodies and fix things at the molecular level ensuring our health and immortality (barring catastrophic accidents like a fatal car crash or falling off a cliff). Obviously we're not there yet.
That will mark the beginning of the end for humans - that's if the earth hasn't succumbed to pollution and lack of food ect. No death means too many humans = path to total war. And why? Well when the crib is bare the horses bite. And this will happen here unless of course science takes the right course and avoids this but I'm afraid it will be left to the politicians who can't decide on the mustard in a hot dog. So we're doomed in the long run.
__________________
Beware of the Spanish Inquisition,coming to a town NEAR you
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 11-04-2006, 02:06 PM
VAXman's Avatar
VAXman(Admin) VAXman is offline
progger propellerhead
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Presently reside in Jackson (southern) NJ (20 miles east of NEARfest 2002 & 2003
Posts: 2,362
Send a message via AIM to VAXman Send a message via Skype™ to VAXman
Re: Sciences on Moon

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick and Roll View Post
No you don't. I just said I wasn't taking part in the rant.

I was complementing jt and Kleber for reasoned comments. I'm really not interested in anything else.
You forget who started it you.

For a guy who is a walking stockpile of jokes, quips and humorous stories, you fail to see the humor in a discussion. I've spent a lifetime with chronic illnesses and more time in hospitals than I'd want to do in 20 lifetimes. The great "science" of medicine hasn't done anything but to prolong misery; therefore, wanting to incorporate a discussion of medicine in and amongst modern sciences seems more laughable than laudable to me. Keith and Bmithra had fun with my comment. I don't see why you couldn't. A little levity now and again is the best "medicine".

Please don't turn this into another reading volumes into words taken out of context debacle.


BTW, it's compliment.
__________________
VAXman -- Watcher of the moon, watcher of all.
----------------Mopper of the moon, mopper of all.
-------------------- Aural Moon's Janitorial Services
---------------------and Restroom Supplies, and Techno-patsy --

Cogito ergo iMac.         
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 11-04-2006, 08:46 PM
Rick and Roll's Avatar
Rick and Roll Rick and Roll is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Baltimore suburbs
Posts: 5,039
Re: Sciences on Moon

Quote:
Originally Posted by VAXman View Post
You forget who started it you.

For a guy who is a walking stockpile of jokes, quips and humorous stories, you fail to see the humor in a discussion. I've spent a lifetime with chronic illnesses and more time in hospitals than I'd want to do in 20 lifetimes. The great "science" of medicine hasn't done anything but to prolong misery; therefore, wanting to incorporate a discussion of medicine in and amongst modern sciences seems more laughable than laudable to me. Keith and Bmithra had fun with my comment. I don't see why you couldn't. A little levity now and again is the best "medicine".

Please don't turn this into another reading volumes into words taken out of context debacle.


BTW, it's compliment.
I have deleted my posts, and said what I needed to say to vax off line. I will not be drawn into an asinine back and forth. No one really cares to hear any vitriol, and if anyone does, you may get your entertainment someplace else.

Vax, I was trying to have a discussion, and you want to get personal. No thank you.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 11-05-2006, 03:15 AM
Bmithra's Avatar
Bmithra Bmithra is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: lost angeleesss
Posts: 607
Re: Sciences on Moon

Geeeeezus! QUACK!QUACK!QUACK! Mellow out guys, this is supposed to be a fun & entertaining discussion of sciences. Fringe, hard core or whatever...

But the key words here are fun & entertaining. We should be entertaining some large & exploratory "What If's". Not bickering.Its beginning to sound like an unhappy married couple. I thought you were married to other people, not each other.

Now Keithie, about those experiments you were involved in...

__________________
People should not be afraid of their Governments,
Governments should be afraid of their People.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 11-05-2006, 07:33 AM
Rick and Roll's Avatar
Rick and Roll Rick and Roll is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Baltimore suburbs
Posts: 5,039
Re: Sciences on Moon

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bmithra View Post
Geeeeezus! QUACK!QUACK!QUACK! Mellow out guys, this is supposed to be a fun & entertaining discussion of sciences.Its beginning to sound like an unhappy married couple. I thought you were married to other people, not each other.
...

You're right!

The visual bothers me somewhat though....
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 11-06-2006, 02:47 AM
KeithieW
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Sciences on Moon

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick and Roll View Post
You're right!

The visual bothers me somewhat though....
Not as much as the visual bothers me Rick. All that hair and......Nurse the screens!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 11-06-2006, 10:26 AM
jtmckinley's Avatar
jtmckinley jtmckinley is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Farmington Hills, Michigan (near Detroit)
Posts: 365
Re: Sciences on Moon

Quote:
Originally Posted by RogorMortis View Post
That will mark the beginning of the end for humans - that's if the earth hasn't succumbed to pollution and lack of food ect. No death means too many humans = path to total war. And why? Well when the crib is bare the horses bite. And this will happen here unless of course science takes the right course and avoids this but I'm afraid it will be left to the politicians who can't decide on the mustard in a hot dog. So we're doomed in the long run.
Possibly, but I doubt it will lead to our extinction, probably a lot of violence, but probably not extinction of the human species IMHO. But then I'm an optimist when it comes to that kind of thing . It will certainly change everything in the sphere of human existence. The obvious issue of overpopulation, which possibly could be handled by people only being allowed to procreate if somebody in their family dies for whatever reason (tough sell), will certainly have to be dealt with. My guess is there will continue to be death of the folks that can't afford to live forever and population growth of those that can. There will likely be much violence as a result of this, but that's not news for humans. But, perhaps a less obvious issue, if nobody dies in the future, how does the economy function? The haves will go on accumulating wealth and power and if they never die it doesn't ever get passed on to the next generation; that could be a major problem. Immortality will not happen overnight however so hopefully we'll have some time to figure out how to deal with it before depletion of earth's resources becomes too dire. I of course assume we'll have clean (solar or fusion based) energy LONG before we ever achieve immortality, otherwise peak oil is going to cause drastic changes in how we live and possibly greatly slow technological development not to mention great death and destruction from wars and famine.

I imagine that if we ever have the technology to provide immortality it will also provide the means to exist in a non-terrestrial environment and this will be the beginning of the human colonization of space. I think this is essential for the long-term survival of the human race since having all our eggs in one basket so to speak, here on the Earth, we could be wiped out by a singe meteor impact. When people live forever (or even just 1000s of years), and if space vessels can be made comfortable enough and can be made large enough to house thousands or even millions of people, travelling through space for long voyages to other planets will become reasonable to many people, perhaps even desireable. Of course that might lead to interstellar wars down the line, but it's possible that as technology (e.g. advanced molecular nanotechnology) allows humans to exist without having to scratch out a living in the hard earth and there is abundance (assuming some fascists don't take over and try to mete it out as they see fit), human nature will evolve and we won't always be at each other's throats. Obviously there's no guarantee human nature will ever evolve, but I continue to hope.

There was an interesting CSPAN program with Ray Kurzweil 11/5/2006 that discussed some of these topics that Moonfolk might find interesting, it's 3 hours long:

http://www.booktv.org/feature/index....15&schedID=457
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 11-09-2006, 08:36 AM
GORT's Avatar
GORT GORT is offline
Patron
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 138
Wink Re: Sciences on Moon

you have good insight JT
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 11-15-2006, 07:59 PM
jtmckinley's Avatar
jtmckinley jtmckinley is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Farmington Hills, Michigan (near Detroit)
Posts: 365
Re: Sciences on Moon

Here's an entertaining (IMHO) history of numbers narrated by Terry Jones of Monty Python fame. It doesn't go as far as calculus and more advanced forms of mathematics, but I think even VAXman might be amused/enlightened by it. I learned a couple of things whilst I was watching, for example, I wasn't aware that Leibniz had come up with binary in the 1600s, or at least I don't remember that I knew that. So without further ado, here's the link:

http://throwawayyourtv.com/2006/11/story-of-one.html

Based on the wikipedia account of Leibniz, he also developed calculus independently of Newton. I was unaware of or at least had forgotten that as well. I had certainly heard of Leibniz, but I guess I really hadn't grasped his accomplishments apparently. He was also the founder of the philosophical school of optimism, which I'm pretty sure I never knew. My take on optimism is different from his I think, at least in requiring a supreme being, but like us all he was a man of his time. I have not yet had the opportunity to read the whole wikipedia article, but I also find it interesting and intend to do so. I think the internet, and whatever it evolves into, may be our saving grace as a species . Here's the link to his wikipedia article, of course it contains many links that folks might find interesting, as most wikipedia links do:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gottfried_Leibniz

The children of this age will bury us with their knowledge, I hope...
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 11-16-2006, 05:01 PM
Maestro's Avatar
Maestro Maestro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: England
Posts: 2
Send a message via MSN to Maestro
Re: Sciences on Moon

Sounds like a great idea, as 'science' does cover such an enormous range of areas.

Nice to keep things mature, but with science.. it's so easy to get distracted.. "oo, a geiger counter, how radioactive am I?"
"oo, a laser, it's my ray gun, POW POW!"

Well, maybe not quite so immaturely...

Puts my physics to good use!
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 11-17-2006, 10:07 AM
Methem Methem is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Oulu, Finland
Posts: 221
Re: Sciences on Moon

Quote:
Originally Posted by jtmckinley View Post
There was an interesting CSPAN program with Ray Kurzweil 11/5/2006 that discussed some of these topics that Moonfolk might find interesting [...]
Just saw this on the USENET group alt.folklore.computers:

Quote:
> Imagine the day when someone will be able to reflect back on the
> last 6000 years of composing programs. Will a.f.c still be around
> in some form?

Well, according to Ray Kuzrweil in "The Singularity is Near"
[...] we will still be around in 6000 years (at least those of us who can
survive until the technological utopia arrives around 2040). But - by
then the computers will have been programming themselves for many
millenia. Maybe the computers will have an a.f.h newsgroup
(alt.folklore.humans) where they will reminisce about the distant past
when humans still programmed them. For a laugh they might even dredge
up some 20th century code.
Hmmm.....


-Methem
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 11-17-2006, 03:56 PM
VAXman's Avatar
VAXman(Admin) VAXman is offline
progger propellerhead
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Presently reside in Jackson (southern) NJ (20 miles east of NEARfest 2002 & 2003
Posts: 2,362
Send a message via AIM to VAXman Send a message via Skype™ to VAXman
Re: Sciences on Moon

Quote:
Originally Posted by Methem View Post
Just saw this on the USENET group alt.folklore.computers:



Hmmm.....


-Methem
Suppose they dredged up Weenoze source code!!! Those computers would be pondering how they ever survived.
__________________
VAXman -- Watcher of the moon, watcher of all.
----------------Mopper of the moon, mopper of all.
-------------------- Aural Moon's Janitorial Services
---------------------and Restroom Supplies, and Techno-patsy --

Cogito ergo iMac.         
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:06 AM.