"New Prog," the genre - A MUST READ

[rick_wakeman]

yep very subjective. trying to consider kinda bands like Muse or Mars Volta or Deep Purple like prog related is legitimate. But i would call them boring bands . They only can switch a bright light on for novices towards rock. Or for teenagers. But wow what a lecture, Yesspaz.

[Hawksun]

I would call them bands with excellent musical ideas; I'd probably call them Prog if my conception of what is prog and what is not wasn't so biased on a certain type of sound. But yeah I guess this could be the start of the next prog genration, that is if more bands follow their steps and continue with their ideas and sound.

Oh and sorry for the rant Spaz, it's just that I hate it when new pointless genre names are introduced for no good reason.

[Rick and Roll]

I've been holding off replying here because I'm not all hot and bothered by the bands mentioned. I've tried the Volta, it's fun in spots, but it's overblown in places.

Yorksvc burned me the Oceansize....it's excellent, but a bit mellow (read slow to develop) for me.

There's plenty of bands in the past 20 years that I consider great. They all don't appear at once. Trying to lump everything in a revival category, well, I don't see it. This music is alive and well in its own niche without any help.

Save the revivals for the preachers

I always cringe when I hear anyone compared to Steve Howe. Steve was great with Yes, and when I've seen him solo and with Yes, but the GTR and Asia is music to yawn by. I like bands working as a cohesive unit (Djam Karet, etc). telling me Johnny Nosepicker sounds like Steve Howe tells me...well I'm not sure.