|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Modern music's success
I'm not so sure it's not just as simple as there are more choices now.
I agree wholeheartedly about commercialism, etc. But too much blame is placed there. It doesn't matter what the product is, if the money is there someone will promote it. To me, progressive music is more than a hobby. It's intense. And the average person cannot invest the time in that. So they look for the simple, the easy. People are busy. I don't think it's any great mystery. A band like IQ is not a going concern. They are not a band that stays together. Most of their later work is recorded separately. So to expect sustained success is unrealistic. Marillion does well enough on their own. So did (does) Yes, etc. Most bands are not making tons of money, even the commercial ones. There are as many commercial bands struggling as prog bands. really, how many really popular bands are there? One thing that bodes well, is that there is a return back to basics with prog. Prog changed as all music did with bands like REM, etc that completely did away with guitar leads and any long songs. So prog tried to incorporate whatever flavor of the month to compensate. Recently, I've heard a ton of bands that sound like the 70's greats, with an updated sound. It's refreshing. Finally, I think prog is rid of it's "snob mentality" (rightly or wrongly). I don't think I've heard the word "eclectic" at all in the last two years...that means Prog is infiltrating the airwaves. Radio will always be the popular, the short-term. I see no reason to worry about Prog not being there. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Modern music's success
I agree with your opinion Woj, about radios, MTV, commercialism and about the improved situation in the last few years. I guess the invention of the compact disc is a problem too: musicians want to fill their discs, so either they put lots of tracks, either they record very long songs, in order to have a 70 minutes disc. That's where the length of prog songs appears, because progressive rock decides to use longer songs, which would not fit on a radio airing. But I noticed that the music that radios are playing is more various than a few years ago, and even sometimes include prog elements, which most of the people I know like. Though, when I want them to listen to prog, they do not want to compare that with the music they can hear on radios. Some of them won't even try and listen to prog.
I believe it's a fashion phenomenon: people like some artists because it's fashion, and so new artists make that kind of music because it's fashion, and so on and so on ...
__________________
Elric |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Modern music's success
Quote:
![]() Quote:
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Modern music's success
I agree Jim, but what I was saying was that these bands were totally unknown here in France. Only Ange and Magma are names that a few people know, but Xang, Maldoror, Clearlight, Halloween, are totally forgotten.
I've only met one French person that knows Halloween and Clearlight and he happens to be my father ![]()
__________________
Elric |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Modern music's success
Quote:
![]() I was chatting with a moonie from Detroit and i asked him about Discipline. Said he hadn't heard of them. It's everywhere Elric.... |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:49 AM. |