Go Back   Aural Moon - Progressive Rock Discussion > Prog Rock Discussion > General Discussion/Prog News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

View Poll Results: What changed music the most in the 20th Century?
Set Drumming 2 6.45%
Electrification 10 32.26%
Computers/Programming 2 6.45%
Multi-track recording 3 9.68%
Radio and consequent formatting 2 6.45%
The switch from musician as performer of someone else's work, to musician as composer 0 0%
the shrinking down of "orchestra size" groups to "small ensemble" size groups 2 6.45%
the rise of Improvisation (jazz and all forms of rejection of playing others' compositions) 2 6.45%
Live Touring 0 0%
Other (please specify) 8 25.81%
Voters: 31. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-28-2006, 05:00 PM
jtmckinley's Avatar
jtmckinley jtmckinley is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Farmington Hills, Michigan (near Detroit)
Posts: 365
Re: A GREAT debate! What changed music?

Quote:
Originally Posted by black max
I'll vote for computers/programming, not because I think it's a definitive "right" answer, but because it's worth mentioning. Yea zillions of people have been able to make music without learning complex instrumentation through the medium of computers; professional musicians have been able to play with different sounds and instruments that they don't know how to play per se through electronics.

Not that this is always a good thing by any means, but then, nothing is.
I have to agree with black max, I almost voted for electrification, but when I started thinking about it, it seemed that computers/software (C/S from here on) really has made the most change in music in the 20th (and now 21st) century. I'm including ICs, analog signal processing, DSP, sampling, waveform editing, MIDI, synthesis, looping, instrument/amp/room simulation etc. all under C/S. Electrification allowed people to be heard by bigger audiences, and amplification allowed for some interesting tonal changes like distortion, but the instruments still sounded pretty similar and you still needed somebody to play the parts. It's arguable whether one should include old analog circuits under C/S but I do since after all the very first computers were analog and modern signal processing almost always has some software running somewhere, so I'm seperating simple amplification from the rest and calling that electrification since for many years that was pretty much all there was.

C/S has allowed the creation of music/sounds that simply couldn't be produced previously. In addition C/S allows one to write music that may be unplayable by humans (some of FZ's polyrhythmic music borders on this). C/S has also allowed composers to hear music they wrote without having to hire people to play it. I'm not saying that not hiring musicians is a good thing, but it does let one work things out on one's own before spending a lot of money to pay people to play it, especially in the case of orchestral music (FZ is again a good example of this and it is likely why he started using the synclavier so much). Also as black max mentioned it allows people who can't even play an instrument to make music, sometimes even with interesting results. And then there is all the recording/mixing/mastering stuff that can be done, well you get the idea...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:08 AM.