|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Should we move from a 56k to a 128k stream? | |||
| Yes! Bring it on! |
  
|
11 | 78.57% |
| No! I can only handle 56k! |
  
|
1 | 7.14% |
| I don't care. I listen at 24k anyway. |
  
|
2 | 14.29% |
| What the heck are you talking about? |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 14. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
05-26-2001, 11:28 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Other streaming speeds
Currently, we have streams for broadband users (56k), and modem users (24k). Are there different speeds you'd like to see on Aural Moon?
For instance, a 128k stream would provide almost CD-quality sound - but your connection would have to be up for it. In reality, if you would be able to listen to the 56k stream OK, the 128k stream shouldn't be a problem. Maybe if you had some slow ISDN line or something. In the other direction, we could provide a real low-quality stream for those with bad modem connections. We could move down to 33k or even (gasp) 16k. Does anyone have these problems? Discuss! Avian 
|
|
#3
06-02-2001, 06:56 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yeah, it's hard to imagine what 128k would sound like, but imagine the quality of the stream essentially doubling.
When I tune into other 128k streams, it just blows me away essentially. Hmmmmm
|
|
#4
07-12-2001, 11:45 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hey - don't forget to give us your opinion on this!
Avian
|
|
#5
07-12-2001, 07:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
128kbps
128kbps is probably 10x better sound quality than 56k, if you want a taste of 128k go to http://www.radioparadise.com, you'll see what I mean.
I would listen more if the bitrate were higher, 56k sounds muffled.
|
|
#6
07-13-2001, 11:06 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
There's one other reason against 128k - it would be more money for us to operate a 128k server with the extra bandwidth it would take up.
Avian
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:16 PM. |
Linear Mode
